Sunday, December 29, 2019

On Taking Notes, Part 8: Getting Feedback

Unlike the six middle steps of note-taking, the first and last steps are collaborative efforts. A good planner asks those in the know for ideas in setting the stage for note-taking; a good writer does the same by asking other good writers for their input on those notes.

This step can take some extra time at first but not in the long run.  Think of some of the benefits:

  • Increased confidence – You'll go into the drafting and rewriting stages of the writing process with a greater sense of being on the right path for your reading audience.
  • Deeper insights – You'll have a better understanding of which details to embellish and which to truncate. 
  • Improved efficiency – You'll save time as you transpose notes to the formal report.
***
Read previous installments in this series:



Saturday, December 28, 2019

On Taking Notes, Part 7: Rewriting the Notes

Rewriting notes is akin to reviewing them; as you review your content, depth, and structure, you make necessary changes. The point of making rewriting a seventh separate step of note-taking, however, is to guarantee you've followed through on your plan. 

Have you ever failed to pack one incidental for a trip, pick up one item from the supermarket, or recall one fact for a test? The same can happen when taking notes. So rewriting stands out for those moments when you move, add, and delete details as you review your notes. The more skilled you become at note-taking, the more reviewing and rewriting seem simultaneous.

***
Read previous installments in this series:

Friday, December 27, 2019

On Taking Notes, Part 6: Reviewing the Notes

Now you've been through the first five steps of the note-taking process: preparing, listening, reading, summarizing, and organizing. Why add review as a sixth step? After all, summarizing and organizing notes are a form of review. The review can be redundant in a great many cases, especially where templates are involved, with their pre-defined categories and limited space. But if you have a broad audience with contrasting concerns and no pre-determined guidelines or standard template, a review is in order.

You should review your notes for consistency in content and depth:
  • Content – Ensure each reported section gets equal treatment among each talking point (e.g., problem - impact - solution - benefit, or, criteria - condition - cause - effect, or, issue - method - options - analysis - recommendation) 
  • Depth – Provide the coverage that each talking point deserves with sufficient detail.

Of course, you can take care of these matters during the drafting stage, but you would be better off with a strong plan because of the increased efficiency it will bring to the writing. Now you are ready for step 7: rewriting, the stuff of the next post.


***
Read previous installments in this series:

Thursday, December 26, 2019

On Taking Notes, Part 5: Organizing the Notes

You've prepared diligently for your meeting, conference, interview, walk-through, or reading; taken copious notes for what you saw, heard, or read; and selected the most important ones for reporting. Now you need to make sure those key points are in order.

Let's say you were organizing a list of problem areas in a production facility. Here are four ways you can organize them:
  • Category – by the three major issues: equipment, staff, and building 
  • Chronology – within equipment, the time in which the problems appear: compressor, conveyor, and wrapper 
  • Importance – within staff, their relative value in the production process: assemblers, packagers, and maintenance
  • Space – within building, the areas in the facility: shipping, production, and storage 
What makes structuring tricky is the range of organizing options available to you. Use them based on what your readers need to know.

***
Read previous installments in this series:

Friday, December 20, 2019

On Taking Notes, Part 4: Hitting the High Points

This eight-part series on note-taking is about the planning stage of the writing process, when you need to collect, organize, and assess content whether reporting on a meeting, documenting a project, or writing an essay for publication. 

Assuming you have captured the key words and phrases described in part 2 of this series, you should now be ready to transcribe them into a bullet list of high points. You're still in the note-taking stage, so quantity is more important than quality. Don't even concern yourself with organizing your list of ideas; that step will come after you have content to assess. You should get started as soon as possible to maximize your chances of recalling what you heard and saw at the meeting. 

As an example, Gino's assignment is to determine the feasibility of renting a satellite office for his company in a neighboring town. Your assignment is to capture the key points of the discussion at a weekly meeting. Your notes look something like this:
Not feasible to rent 135 Main Street, 3rd floor, only available space in Oakville. Toured area. No problems there except no public transportation. No big deal, all of our staff  drive to work. Good restaurants a block away (Big Garden Chinese, Americana Diner, Supreme Soul Food, Suave Soups). Walked entire floor: 2,000 square feet, sufficient for proposed 15 staff. Rent $12.75 square foot. Area average $8.40 square foot. Report at meeting next week on Parkton rental space.

Now create a bullet list of the items under an agenda-item heading:

Satellite Office Feasibility Study
  • Gino says: not feasible to rent 135 Main Street, 3rd floor, 2,000 square feet, only available space in Oakville 
  • Rent: $12.75/square foot, 52% higher than area average
  • Gino will check in Parkton, report in meeting next week 
Notice all the information that has disappeared: the public transportation factor, nearby restaurants, even the sufficiency of the space. What matters for the record is the agenda item (renting satellite office), issue discussed (too expensive), action item (check Parkton), owner (Gino), and deadline (meeting next week).

But what if questions pop up about how great the space itself is?  They likely won't, but you'll always have your notes if they do.

***

Read previous installments in this series:
Part 1: Preparing to Take Notes
Part 2: Listening with a Purpose
Part 3: Reading with a Purpose

Friday, December 13, 2019

On Taking Notes, Part 3: Reading with a Purpose

The main difference between note-taking for a live event and for reading is the control you have over the situation. Part 2 of this series on taking notes offers two useful tips for reviewing meetings. Those pointers, looking and listening for key words and phrases and asking for clarification, apply to an extent when it comes to reading, but you can do more as you have greater control over the content delivery as a reader.

I would suggest as a first step reading Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren's How to Read a Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading, which I review in this blog. In this highly educational book, the authors detail four levels of reading: 

  • The elementary level focuses on word, sentence, and paragraph recognition and vocabulary development.
  • The inspectional level looks at learning the content and basis of the book. 
  • The analytical level covers interpreting and critiquing the reader's viewpoint.
  • The synoptical level involves capturing the relevance of the book.  

Next, you should check reviews of the book to classify its type (e.g., biography, business, philosophy, politics) and summarize it in fewer than 50 words, including the issues it addresses. Then search the book for key words as you would when taking notes at a meeting or conference. Of course, a lot goes into these steps, but with practice you'll be able to cover them quickly.

Let's assume you have been assigned to review a book for your manager or team. (Yes, there are visionary, proactive managers who still engage in this practice.) I doubt you would do so to contribute to your manager's leisure reading list. A business purpose must accompany the assignment. Are you reading Stephen A. Schwarzman's What It Takes (also reviewed in this blog) to extract business principles that may be useful back at the office? Then you would do well to look at Schwarzman's 25 Rules for Work and Life at the conclusion of the book and search the index for where the author discusses the specific rule that captures your interest. On the other hand, if you were searching Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress to determine whether his historical perspective synchronizes with your company's mindset, you might be looking for supporting content that may bolster your organizational public relations strategy.  Finally, are you reading Rebecca D. Costa's The Watchman's Rattle: Thinking Our Way Out of Extinction to view how worldwide trends may affect your firm's global ambitions? If yes, then search for the big questions Costa answers throughout the book.

And still there's more. How to Read a Book will fill in the blanks. 


***
Read previous installments in this series:
Part 1: Preparing to Take Notes
Part 2: Listening with a Purpose

Friday, December 06, 2019

On Taking Notes, Part 2: Listening with a Purpose

Part 1 of this series on note-taking covered the three key questions to answer in preparing to listen at a meeting or to read a book. This part covers tips for listening with a purpose, and part 3 will cover reading with a purpose because each demands different focuses, skills, and approaches.

1. Look and listen for the key words and phrases. For each agenda item of business meetings, I search for four points: issue discussed, action item, owner, and timeline. For conference sessions, I search for six: issue discussed, critical challenge, strategy used, business resultlesson learned, and business applicability.

But there's more to it than that. Assume you are preparing to write meeting minutes. You have come to this session with a plan by answering the key questions I raised in part 1 of this series. Now that you are at the meeting, you should be prepared to capture the key words and phrases the presenters discuss. If they mention the problem (e.g., the system went down), capture its impact ($50,000 of lost revenue); without an impact, there is no problem. If they analyze the options, create a checklist of their advantages and disadvantages; options without advantages and disadvantages are not real options. It they offer a recommendation from among those options, look for its unique benefits; recommendations are hollow without those benefits. 

Make notes by simply bulleting the points and creating tables for which you must complete all columns and rows. Using this techniques ensures you capture all the key points and their supporting points. For instance, say you plug into your table for agenda item 1 the impact of the problem and just the recommendation 1, and agenda item 2 just the problem and the recommendation and benefits. You will see blank boxes for the benefits of the recommendation in the agenda item 1 and for impact of the problem in agenda item 2. Fill in those blank spaces. These key words or phrases, or numbers for that matter, might appear on the presenter's slides, so keep an eye on them as well.

As for using a tape recorder at meetings, I would advise against it unless you are reporting for a publication where precise direct quotes are necessary. Reviewing the tape recorder can defer focusing at the meeting and will take more time than the verbatim value it brings.

2. Ask for clarification. Of course, the practice of looking and listening for key words and phrases assumes that the speakers are on point. Too often they are not, so you'll have to be bold by asking for the business impact, suggested resolution, or action plan. Those who ask shall receive.

I will apply similar tips but with a different spin to reading with a purpose, the theme of part 3.